How To Reduce ETL Costs Without Sacrificing Performance

Published on August 7, 2025

The Cloud Giants Delivered Infrastructure Transparency, ETL Vendors Stayed Silent

AWS re:Invent 2024 dropped a bombshell for anyone managing cloud costs. Enhanced Cost Anomaly Detection. AI-powered cost analysis through Amazon Q. Custom billing views that actually make sense. And most importantly, direct responses to the £1,000+ overnight billing disasters that have become horror stories across the industry.

Meanwhile, the ETL vendors? Radio silence.

This isn’t just about features. It’s about fundamentally different approaches to customer relationships. Whilst cloud providers are racing to give you more control over your spend, ETL vendors are doubling down on pricing models that keep you in the dark, undermining the infrastructure transparency modern teams now expect.

This isn’t just about features. It’s about fundamentally different approaches to customer relationships. Whilst cloud providers are racing to give you more control over your spend, ETL vendors are doubling down on pricing models that keep you in the dark, undermining the infrastructure transparency modern teams now expect.

How to Identify Hidden Costs in Your Current ETL Setup

Before comparing vendor approaches, you need to understand what’s actually driving your ETL spend. Most teams discover they’re paying for far more than they realise when they audit their current pipelines.

Start by examining these cost drivers:

  • Duplicate data processing: How often are you syncing the same static lookup tables or reference data?
  • Full dataset reloads: Are you refreshing entire tables when incremental updates would suffice?
  • Inactive pipeline charges: Which pipelines haven’t delivered value in the past quarter but are still running?
  • Peak-time processing: Could non-critical syncs run during cheaper off-peak hours?
  • Row multiplication penalties: Are you being charged for every row, even when 90% of your data hasn’t changed?

One data team discovered they were processing the same customer dimension table 47 times daily across different pipelines. Each sync triggered row-based charges, despite the underlying data changing perhaps twice per week.

The hidden cost? £3,400 monthly for processing static data.

AWS recognised this inefficiency problem, which is why their re:Invent announcements focused heavily on cost anomaly detection and AI-powered optimisation recommendations. They understand that infrastructure transparency—not arbitrary pricing—is key to long-term customer trust and sustainable cost control.

The Problem: ETL Vendors Profit from Cost Opacity

Here’s what AWS understood that ETL vendors apparently don’t: unpredictable costs are a competitive disadvantage.

When a startup founder wakes up to a £1,300 AWS S3 bill from unauthorised requests, AWS doesn’t celebrate the revenue. They fix the billing system. When Google Cloud customers face £72,000 overnight spikes, Google builds better anomaly detection, not better invoice explanations.

But ETL vendors? They’ve built business models around cost unpredictability:

  • Row-based pricing that punishes growth: Every new customer means more rows processed, which means higher bills, regardless of whether the data is useful
  • No real-time cost visibility: You discover overruns after they’ve happened, not before
  • Efficiency penalties: Optimise your pipelines all you want. If the row count stays the same, so does your bill
  • Volume multipliers that ignore value: Processing duplicate data? Still charged. Syncing unchanged records? Still charged. Running efficient incremental updates? Doesn’t matter. Rows are rows

The contrast is stark. Cloud providers are building AI systems to predict and prevent cost overruns. ETL vendors are still charging you for processing the same static lookup table 365 times a year.

What Smart Data Teams Learned from AWS re:Invent 2024

Forward-thinking data leaders watched AWS re:Invent with a different lens. They weren’t just looking at the new features—they were studying AWS’s approach to customer cost management.

They Demand Performance-Based Pricing That Rewards Efficiency

AWS doesn’t charge you based on how many API calls you could theoretically make. They charge you for the compute, storage, and bandwidth you actually consume. It’s transparent, measurable, and directly tied to value delivered.

Smart data teams are asking: why should ETL be any different?

The benefits of performance-based pricing over row-based pricing in ETL are clear:

  • Pay for infrastructure used, not arbitrary metrics: Compute cycles, storage space, and execution frequency reflect real costs
  • Efficiency improvements reduce bills immediately: Optimise a pipeline to run 50% faster, see immediate cost savings
  • Growth doesn’t trigger automatic penalties: Business success shouldn’t inflate your ETL budget through volume multipliers
  • Predictable scaling: Costs grow with actual infrastructure needs, not arbitrary row counts

Performance-based pricing means paying for compute time, storage usage, and execution frequency. The actual infrastructure costs of moving your data. When you optimise your pipelines to run faster or use less storage, your bill goes down immediately. When your business grows but your data efficiency improves, costs can actually decrease.

They Use Mirror Mode for Risk-Free Validation

The AWS approach to innovation is instructive: they run new systems alongside old ones, validate performance, then cut over when confidence is high. No big-bang migrations. No faith-based decisions.

That’s exactly how Mirror Mode works for ETL switching. We run your existing pipeline logic inside Matatika alongside your current provider. Both systems process the same data. You compare costs, performance, and outputs using real workloads. Not demos or promises.

Only when you’re completely confident do you make the switch. No downtime. No disruption. No double payments.

Steps to Reduce ETL Costs Without Sacrificing Performance

The AWS re:Invent announcements prove that infrastructure transparency is possible. You don’t need to wait for your ETL vendor to follow suit. Here are immediate actions you can take to reduce costs whilst maintaining or improving performance:

Immediate Cost Reduction Strategies

  1. Audit Pipeline Efficiency
  • Identify pipelines processing unchanged data repeatedly
  • Switch full refreshes to incremental updates where possible
  • Decommission unused or duplicate data flows
  • Schedule non-critical syncs during off-peak hours
  1. Implement Smart Scheduling
  • Move non-urgent pipelines to low-cost processing windows
  • Batch similar transformations to reduce compute overhead
  • Use event-driven triggers instead of time-based scheduling for static data
  1. Optimise Data Processing
  • Pre-filter data at source to reduce row counts
  • Compress data transfers where bandwidth is metered
  • Use columnar storage formats for analytical workloads
  • Implement proper indexing strategies

Long-term Strategic Changes

  1. Transition from Row-Based to Performance-Based Pricing
  • Evaluate vendors that charge for actual infrastructure usage
  • Calculate potential savings using your current usage patterns
  • Plan migration during renewal periods to avoid contract penalties
  1. Implement Real-Time Cost Monitoring
  • Set up alerts for unusual processing spikes
  • Track cost per business outcome, not just total spend
  • Monitor efficiency metrics: cost per transformed record, processing time per GB

These optimisations often deliver 30-50% cost reductions without impacting data quality or delivery speed. The key is measuring infrastructure consumption rather than arbitrary volume metrics.

Supporting Insight: The AWS S3 Billing Fix Proves the Point

In May 2024, AWS made a telling change to S3 billing after customers complained about overnight cost spikes from unauthorised requests. Instead of defending their billing model or offering “cost management best practices,” they fixed the underlying issue.

The message was clear: customer success matters more than revenue optimisation.

Compare that to the ETL industry response when teams complain about unpredictable row-based pricing. The standard response? “Here’s how to optimise your sync frequency” or “Consider our enterprise tier for better rates.”

The problem isn’t your sync frequency. The problem is a pricing model that treats data movement like a luxury good instead of essential infrastructure.

One data engineering manager put it perfectly: “AWS builds tools to help me spend less. My ETL vendor builds features to help me spend more efficiently on the same broken pricing model.”

FAQs

How can I identify inefficiencies in my current ETL pipelines without disrupting operations?

Start with usage analysis rather than system changes. Review your pipeline logs to identify patterns: which jobs process the same data repeatedly, how often do full dataset refreshes actually contain new information, and which pipelines haven’t been accessed in months. Most ETL platforms provide usage analytics that reveal inefficiencies without requiring any system modifications. These insights are a vital first step toward achieving infrastructure transparency.

What are the hidden costs of row-based ETL pricing I should watch for?

Row-based pricing often includes costs you don’t see upfront: charges for processing duplicate records, fees for syncing unchanged data, penalties for processing development or staging data at production rates, and multipliers that increase during peak usage. Additionally, row-based models often count derived records (like joins or aggregations) as separate billable rows, inflating costs for complex transformations.

How do I transition from row-based to performance-based ETL pricing without downtime?

Use a parallel validation approach like Mirror Mode. Run your existing ETL alongside a performance-based alternative, processing the same data simultaneously. Compare costs, performance, and outputs using real workloads over several weeks. Only when you’re confident in the results do you cut over. This eliminates the guesswork and proves cost savings before you commit.

What performance metrics should I track when optimising ETL costs?

Focus on efficiency ratios rather than absolute numbers: cost per GB processed, processing time per transformation, compute utilisation during peak vs off-peak hours, and most importantly, cost per business outcome delivered. These metrics help you identify where optimisation efforts will have the biggest impact on both costs and performance.

How risky is switching ETL providers to achieve better pricing?

Traditional migrations are risky because they require rebuilding everything from scratch. However, modern approaches like side-by-side validation eliminate most risks. You can prove cost savings and performance improvements before making any production changes. The bigger risk is often staying with inefficient pricing models that compound over time, especially in environments lacking infrastructure transparency.

From Cost Opacity to Infrastructure Transparency

The AWS re:Invent announcements weren’t just product updates. They were a statement about how infrastructure providers should treat customer cost management. Transparency over opacity. Proactive alerts over reactive billing. AI-powered insights over manual optimisation.

The ETL industry’s silence on similar innovations reveals everything about their priorities. Whilst cloud providers compete on cost transparency, ETL vendors still profit from cost complexity.

Ready to take control of your ETL costs with the same transparency AWS delivers for cloud infrastructure?

Download the ETL Escape Plan – our comprehensive framework for assessing your current setup, identifying immediate cost savings, and planning strategic improvements with full risk mitigation.

You’ll get:

  • Cost assessment methodology to benchmark your current spend
  • 8 immediate cost-saving strategies you can implement today
  • Mirror Mode validation guide for risk-free ETL evaluation
  • ROI calculator for leadership presentations
  • Performance-based pricing comparison framework

The cloud providers have shown what infrastructure transparency looks like. It’s time your ETL platform followed their lead.

#Blog #Cloud Cost Optimisation #Data Pipeline Strategy #Infrastructure Transparency #Reduce Data Engineering Spend #Transparent Pricing Models

Data Leaders Digest

Stay up to date with the latest news and insights for data leaders.