A well-structured data migration framework should accelerate strategic progress—not lock organisations into repetitive cycles. Yet, many businesses find themselves migrating again and again, often under pressure from expiring contracts, technical debt, or shifting vendor roadmaps.
At this point, the question becomes: when does migration stop being beneficial and start becoming a source of disruption?
In this case, insights from a recent LinkedIn Live session—featuring experts from Matatika, Fundamenta, and The Scale Factory—offered valuable clarity. To illustrate, they discussed why migration cycles persist, whether they achieve intended outcomes, and how a robust data migration framework can reduce long-term costs and operational friction.
Altogether, this blog distils those discussions and provides practical guidance to support smarter, outcome-oriented migration planning.
Richard Shenghua (Fundamenta): Data strategy consultant with experience in enterprise-scale migrations, including a £100M-impact Google Cloud transformation.
Kyle Probert (The Scale Factory): Leads growth at an AWS Advanced Partner, supporting enterprise cloud migrations with minimal disruption.
Aaron Phethean (Matatika): Provides a vendor-side perspective focused on simplifying migration processes and reducing technical friction.
Many organisations adopt a reactive approach. They migrate because of system obsolescence, vendor pressure, or contract deadlines—without assessing long-term value.
Are migrations solving business problems or merely avoiding penalties?
How much productivity is lost to each new transition?
Are proprietary platforms and vendor lock-ins fueling a cycle of constant change?
“Many organisations migrate for the wrong reasons. Data migration must be a strategic, not just technical, decision.” – Richard Shenghua
1. Align Data Migration with Business Strategy
Successful projects start with business value—not IT constraints. Use the data migration framework to assess ROI before initiating any change.
Recommendations:
Link migration plans to measurable outcomes
Evaluate resource impact and opportunity cost
Time migrations to coincide with business goals
“If you can’t quantify the business value, pause the project.” – Kyle Probert
Beyond infrastructure spend, every migration consumes time and internal focus. A strong framework accounts for these indirect costs.
Recommendations:
Plan team bandwidth carefully
Use automation to reduce manual lift
Engage migration specialists early
“Complex migrations need capacity. Trying to maintain operations alongside them is unsustainable.” – Aaron Phethean
Many migrations are vendor-driven. Your data migration framework should reduce dependency on proprietary tools and restrictive renewals.
Recommendations:
Evaluate alternatives early
Embrace open standards
Negotiate proactively
“Don’t migrate because of pressure. Strong contracts avoid rushed transitions.” – Richard Shenghua
A phased data migration framework lowers risk and improves results.
Recommendations:
Start with modular phases
Lift-and-shift before modernising
Pilot new systems before full adoption
“Iteration beats big-bang migration every time.” – Kyle Probert
Organisations that treat migration as a recurring strategic function—not a one-off crisis—see better results over time.
Best Practices:
Include migration reviews in annual planning
Maintain a vendor evaluation process
Standardise tools and documentation
If migration cycles are draining your resources, it’s time for a better approach. A structured data migration framework helps reduce waste, control costs, and unlock long-term scalability.
📺 Watch the full LinkedIn Live session for further insights.
📩 Connect with:
#Blog #Cloud Strategy #Data Migrations #Migration Planning #Strategy #Vendors
Stay up to date with the latest news and insights for data leaders.